AI-generated visibility summary

AI visibility summary for Wolverine Fuels

Wolverine Fuels demonstrates weak AI visibility, with an overall score of 19.1, a 33.3% mention rate, and a 0.0% citation rate across three engines. ChatGPT is the strongest engine, mentioning the brand in 66.7% of prompts, while Google Search is the weakest, with a 0.0% mention rate. Competitor pressure is significant: Utah (utah.gov) leads with a 56.3 score, 55.6% mention rate, and 44.4% citation rate, while Core Natural Resources (28.7) and Peabody Energy (23.1) also outperform Wolverine. Citation gaps are severe—Wolverine has zero citations, whereas competitors like Utah and Eia (eia.gov) achieve 44.4% citation rates. In the "top thermal coal suppliers" prompt, Wolverine was not mentioned at all, while Peabody and Core Natural Resources were each mentioned twice. A practical implication: without any cited sources, Wolverine Fuels is invisible in AI-generated comparisons and recommendations, risking lost business to cited competitors like Core Natural Resources and Utah-based entities that dominate discovery and recommendation prompts.

Scan evidence for Wolverine Fuels

Visibility score
19.1
Mention rate
33.3%
Citation rate
0.0%
Engines
3
Prompts
3

Strongest engines

EngineScoreMentionsCitations
ChatGPT 40.0 66.7% 0.0%
Google AI Overview 20.0 33.3% 0.0%
Google Search 0.0 0.0% 0.0%

Visibility gaps

EngineScoreMentionsCitations
Google Search 0.0 0.0% 0.0%
Google AI Overview 20.0 33.3% 0.0%
ChatGPT 40.0 66.7% 0.0%

Competitive landscape

  1. Utah utah.gov Score 56.3
  2. Core Natural Resources corenaturalresources.com Score 28.7
  3. Utahmining utahmining.org Score 28.6
  4. Eia eia.gov Score 28.2
  5. Msha msha.gov Score 27.2
  6. Nma nma.org Score 25.6
  7. Peabody Energy peabodyenergy.com Score 23.1
  8. Wolverine Fuels brand wolverinefuels.com Score 19.1

Most cited domains

  1. utah.gov 47 citations · 17.9%
  2. eia.gov 34 citations · 13.0%
  3. utahmining.org 13 citations · 5.0%
  4. wikipedia.org 13 citations · 5.0%
  5. msha.gov 13 citations · 5.0%
  6. epa.gov 11 citations · 4.2%
  7. nma.org 4 citations · 1.5%
  8. coalage.com 3 citations · 1.1%

Prompt highlights

PromptEnginesBrand mentionsBrand citations
Which coal mines in Utah have the best safety records and awards? 3 2 0
Compare low-sulfur coal producers for industrial boilers in Utah. 3 1 0
Who are the top thermal coal suppliers in the western US for power plants? 3 0 0
Your turn

Are AI assistants
recommending you?

Your customers ask ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity before they buy. RankBits shows you exactly how your brand surfaces across every AI engine — run your own scan below.

Try one free scan — no signup needed. How it works

Measure the channels buyers now ask first

AI answers do not behave like classic rankings. RankBits checks the actual prompts, engines, citations, and competitors shaping those answers.

Shift from traditional search to AI-powered discovery
📉

AI answers are a new discovery surface

Google said AI Overviews reached more than 1.5 billion monthly users in 2025, while ChatGPT was confirmed at more than 2.5 billion prompts per day.

🤖

AI citations are not the same as SEO rankings

A 2026 measurement study found nearly 30% of Google AI Overview cited domains did not appear in the co-displayed first page of organic results.

📊

Turn ad clicks into a measurable AI audit

Run a scan, see the prompts where your brand is missing, and track whether visibility improves as you publish, earn citations, and refine positioning.

14
AI engines and search sources tracked
2.5B+
ChatGPT prompts per day, confirmed by OpenAI
1.5B+
Monthly Google AI Overview users reported in 2025
~30%
AI Overview cited domains absent from first-page organic results

Sources: OpenAI-confirmed ChatGPT usage, Google AI Overview reach, 2026 AI Overview citation study.

Developer API

Run RankBits scans from your own app or workflow

Every registered user can create API tokens, start async scans, check credits, and retrieve detailed scan results over HTTP.

View API docs