AI-generated visibility summary
AI visibility summary for CodingFleet
CodingFleet registers a 0.0% mention rate across three prompts and three engines, with an overall score of 3.3 and a consensus score of 1.6. Its only visibility comes from citations: an 11.1% citation rate, driven entirely by Google Search (33.3%), where its score reaches 15.0. ChatGPT and Google AI Overview both return 0.0% on mention and citation, making them the weakest engines and leaving two of three surfaces with no presence at all. Competitor pressure is severe. Github leads at a 100% mention rate and a 64.3 score, followed by Claude (77.8%, 53.4) and Cursor (77.8%, 50.0); even lower-ranked Replit, Tabnine, and Codeium each appear in 33.3% of answers. Citation share reinforces the gap: cursor.com holds 22.0% of cited domains, go.dev 13.0%, while codingfleet.com does not appear among cited domains. The citation pattern is inconsistent rather than absent—CodingFleet is cited once on the Python-to-Go how-to prompt but not mentioned, and is neither cited nor mentioned on the discovery and comparison prompts, where Github, Cursor, and Claude dominate. The practical implication is that CodingFleet's AI visibility currently rests on isolated citations without accompanying brand mentions, so citation presence and mention presence are not reinforcing each other across engines.
Prompt search volumes in this report are AI estimates, not measured keyword data.
