AI-generated visibility summary

AI visibility summary for Esypro

Esypro's AI visibility is minimal: across 3 providers and 3 prompts, its mention rate is 0.0%, citation rate 22.2%, and overall score 1.8, with a consensus score of 0.0. Google Search is the strongest engine (score 10.7, citation rate 66.7%), while ChatGPT and Google AI Overview are the weakest, each scoring 0.0 with no mentions or citations. Competitor pressure is substantial: Pacline leads at 35.3, followed by Ssi Schaefer (29.0), Durr (26.3), and Dematic (24.3), all far above Esypro. The citation gap is stark—Esypro is cited in only 2 of 9 results and never mentioned, while Pacline (10 citations), Ssi Schaefer (9), and Railexcorp (8) dominate cited domains. Esypro's two citations appear in the discovery and comparison prompts, but it is absent from the how-to prompt. Practically, Esypro's near-zero consensus and mention rates indicate it is not being surfaced in AI-generated answers, so improving presence in ChatGPT and Google AI Overview is the clearest priority.

Scan evidence for Esypro

Visibility score
1.8
Mention rate
0.0%
Citation rate
22.2%
Engines
3
Prompts
3

Strongest engines

EngineScoreMentionsCitations
Google Search 10.7 0.0% 66.7%
ChatGPT 0.0 0.0% 0.0%
Google AI Overview 0.0 0.0% 0.0%

Visibility gaps

EngineScoreMentionsCitations
Google AI Overview 0.0 0.0% 0.0%
ChatGPT 0.0 0.0% 0.0%
Google Search 10.7 0.0% 66.7%

Competitive landscape

  1. Pacline pacline.com Score 35.3
  2. Ssi Schaefer ssi-schaefer.com Score 29.0
  3. Durr durr.com Score 26.3
  4. Dematic dematic.com Score 24.3
  5. Webb Stiles webb-stiles.com Score 17.1
  6. Duerkopp duerkopp.com Score 14.5
  7. Railexcorp railexcorp.com Score 13.4
  8. Srsconveyors srsconveyors.com Score 11.2

Most cited domains

  1. pacline.com 10 citations · 6.6%
  2. ssi-schaefer.com 9 citations · 6.0%
  3. railexcorp.com 8 citations · 5.3%
  4. osha.gov 7 citations · 4.6%
  5. srsconveyors.com 6 citations · 4.0%
  6. durr.com 5 citations · 3.3%
  7. transitic.com 4 citations · 2.6%
  8. duerkopp.com 4 citations · 2.6%

Prompt highlights

PromptEnginesBrand mentionsBrand citations
What are the best overhead conveyor systems for hanging garment logistics in manufacturing plants? 3 0 1
Comparing manual vs automated power and free conveyor systems for industrial storage and sequencing 3 0 1
How to automate manual overhead transport in a paint shop to improve efficiency? 3 0 0
Your turn

Are AI assistants
recommending you?

Your customers ask ChatGPT, Grok, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity before they buy. RankBits shows you exactly how your brand surfaces across every AI engine — run your own scan below.

Try one free scan — no signup needed.

Measure the channels buyers now ask first

AI answers do not behave like classic rankings. RankBits checks the actual prompts, engines, citations, and competitors shaping those answers.

Shift from traditional search to AI-powered discovery
📉

AI answers are a new discovery surface

Google said AI Overviews reached more than 1.5 billion monthly users in 2025, while ChatGPT was confirmed at more than 2.5 billion prompts per day.

🤖

AI citations are not the same as SEO rankings

A 2026 measurement study found nearly 30% of Google AI Overview cited domains did not appear in the co-displayed first page of organic results.

📊

Turn ad clicks into a measurable AI audit

Run a scan, see the prompts where your brand is missing, and track whether visibility improves as you publish, earn citations, and refine positioning.

18
AI engines and search sources tracked
2.5B+
ChatGPT prompts per day, confirmed by OpenAI
1.5B+
Monthly Google AI Overview users reported in 2025
~30%
AI Overview cited domains absent from first-page organic results

Sources: OpenAI-confirmed ChatGPT usage, Google AI Overview reach, 2026 AI Overview citation study.

Developer API

Run RankBits scans from your own app or workflow

Every registered user can create API tokens, start async scans, check credits, and retrieve detailed scan results over HTTP.

View API docs