AI-generated visibility summary
AI visibility summary for Esypro
Esypro's AI visibility is limited and uneven. Across three engines and three prompts, it records a 22.2% mention rate, a 33.3% citation rate, and an overall score of 23.2, placing it third behind Pacline (53.5) and SSI Schaefer (25.8). Engine behavior diverges sharply: Google Search never mentions Esypro but cites it in 66.7% of results, while Google AI Overview mentions it at 33.3% yet cites it in none. ChatGPT sits between, at 33.3% on both. The citation gap is the core problem. Esypro earns four citations against eight mentions, and its domain does not appear among the top cited domains, where Pacline (18), Daifuku (17), and osha.gov (17) lead. Competitor pressure is concentrated: Pacline's 55.6% mention rate is more than double Esypro's. In the two highest-volume prompts — overhead conveyors for automotive assembly (880 estimated monthly searches) and manual versus automated paint shop systems (720 estimated) — Esypro is cited once each but never mentioned. The practical implication is that Esypro is being used as a source without being named as a recommendation, so visibility depends on converting existing citations into mentions.
Prompt search volumes in this report are AI estimates, not measured keyword data.
