AI-generated visibility summary
AI visibility summary for Esypro
Esypro's AI visibility is weak and uneven. Across three engines and three prompts (nine results), it records an 11.1% mention rate and 22.2% citation rate, for an overall score of 7.1 and a consensus score of just 1.7—the lowest consensus among the nine brands compared. ChatGPT is its strongest engine (33.3% mention and citation, score 22.7); Google Search cites esypro.com in one of three results but never mentions the brand (score 15.0); Google AI Overview produces nothing (0.0). Competitor pressure is substantial: Dematic leads at 31.3, followed by Pacline (28.8) and SSI Schaefer (25.9), all above Esypro. In the discovery prompt on power-and-free overhead conveyors for automotive paint lines (estimated volume 320), Esypro is neither mentioned nor cited, while Pacline, Rwconveyor, Daifuku, Durr and Taikisha Na each appear. Esypro's only mention comes in the recommendation prompt on turnkey hanging-parts storage and sequencing in Europe (estimated volume 150), where it is also cited; in the how-to prompt (estimated volume 210) it is cited but not mentioned. Citation coverage is thin: esypro.com does not appear among the most-cited domains, which are led by caldan.dk (15 citations, 8.3% share) and osha.gov (12, 6.7%). The practical implication is that Esypro's presence depends on a single prompt and engine, leaving discovery-stage queries largely uncontested.
Prompt search volumes in this report are AI estimates, not measured keyword data.
