AI-generated visibility summary

AI visibility summary for Example Domain

Example Domain registers a 22.2% mention rate across three engines and nine results, with an overall score of 6.7 and a raw score of 13.3. Its visibility is uneven: ChatGPT and Google AI Overview each return a 33.3% mention rate and a score of 20.0, while Google Search returns 0.0% on both. The brand is mentioned in two of three tracked answers but cited in none, producing a 0.0% citation rate and a consensus score of 0.0. Competitor pressure is concentrated: Topalternatives leads the comparison set at 25.8, with a 22.2% mention rate and 22.2% citation rate, and appears in the alternatives prompt with two mentions and two citations. Cursor dominates cited domains at 29.5% share, followed by nist.gov at 20.5%. No brand-owned domain appears among cited sources, so Example Domain is described by engines without being referenced. The practical implication is that the brand's gap is citation-based rather than purely mention-based, since it already surfaces in answers but supplies none of the sources engines draw on.

Prompt search volumes in this report are AI estimates, not measured keyword data.

Loading report…

Scan evidence for Example Domain

Visibility score
6.7
Mention rate
22.2%
Citation rate
0.0%
Engines
3
Prompts
3

Strongest engines

EngineScoreMentionsCitations
ChatGPT 20.0 33.3% 0.0%
Google AI Overview 20.0 33.3% 0.0%
Google Search 0.0 0.0% 0.0%

Visibility gaps

EngineScoreMentionsCitations
Google Search 0.0 0.0% 0.0%
Google AI Overview 20.0 33.3% 0.0%
ChatGPT 20.0 33.3% 0.0%

Competitive landscape

  1. Topalternatives topalternatives.to Score 25.8
  2. Findalternatives findalternatives.net Score 9.2
  3. Example Domain brand example.com Score 6.7
  4. Datacamp datacamp.com Score 6.0
  5. Gov gov.uk Score 5.8
  6. Techradar techradar.com Score 5.6
  7. Cursor cursor.com Score 3.4
  8. Study.com study.com Score 3.4

Most cited domains

  1. cursor.com 13 citations · 29.5%
  2. nist.gov 9 citations · 20.5%
  3. techradar.com 4 citations · 9.1%
  4. topalternatives.to 3 citations · 6.8%
  5. gov.uk 3 citations · 6.8%
  6. datacamp.com 2 citations · 4.5%
  7. answersocrates.com 2 citations · 4.5%
  8. explodingtopics.com 2 citations · 4.5%

Prompt highlights

PromptEnginesBrand mentionsBrand citations
How to choose the right platform? 3 1 0
Top alternatives in this category 3 1 0
What are the best tools in this space? 3 0 0
Your turn

Are AI assistants
recommending you?

Your customers ask ChatGPT, Grok, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity before they buy. RankBits shows you exactly how your brand surfaces across every AI engine — run your own scan below.

Try one free scan — no signup needed.

Measure the channels buyers now ask first

AI answers do not behave like classic rankings. RankBits checks the actual prompts, engines, citations, and competitors shaping those answers.

Shift from traditional search to AI-powered discovery
📉

AI answers are a new discovery surface

Google said AI Overviews reached more than 1.5 billion monthly users in 2025, while ChatGPT was confirmed at more than 2.5 billion prompts per day.

🤖

AI citations are not the same as SEO rankings

A 2026 measurement study found nearly 30% of Google AI Overview cited domains did not appear in the co-displayed first page of organic results.

📊

Turn ad clicks into a measurable AI audit

Run a scan, see the prompts where your brand is missing, and track whether visibility improves as you publish, earn citations, and refine positioning.

18
AI engines and search sources tracked
2.5B+
ChatGPT prompts per day, confirmed by OpenAI
1.5B+
Monthly Google AI Overview users reported in 2025
~30%
AI Overview cited domains absent from first-page organic results

Sources: OpenAI-confirmed ChatGPT usage, Google AI Overview reach, 2026 AI Overview citation study.

Developer API

Run RankBits scans from your own app or workflow

Every registered user can create API tokens, start async scans, check credits, and retrieve detailed scan results over HTTP.

View API docs