AI-generated visibility summary
AI visibility summary for Bubble
Bubble leads the no-code category in AI visibility with a 65.5% mention rate and an overall score of 48.6, outperforming competitors like Adalo (34.6) and Softr (29.9). Its strongest engine is ChatGPT, where it achieves an 85.0% mention rate and a 70.0% citation rate, the highest citation rate across all engines. Its weakest engine is Bing Search, with only a 25.0% mention rate and a 35.0% citation rate, resulting in a score of 29.7. Despite strong mention rates, Bubble faces citation gaps: its overall citation rate of 23.6% lags behind Adalo’s 30.9%, and on engines like Claude and Gemini, Bubble receives zero citations despite being mentioned in 75.0% and 65.0% of prompts, respectively. Competitor pressure is evident in high-volume prompts: for "how to create a mobile app with no-code" (5,600 volume), Adalo is mentioned 9 times and cited 9 times, while Bubble is mentioned only 6 times and cited 3 times. A practical implication is that Bubble’s AI visibility is strong for awareness but weak for credibility in mobile app and AI feature contexts, where competitors like Adalo and Zite secure more citations.
