AI-generated visibility summary

AI visibility summary for CodingFleet

CodingFleet holds a marginal AI visibility position with an overall score of 5.3, driven by a 6.0% mention rate and a 10.0% citation rate across 10 engines. Its strongest performance comes from Claude and Exa, each achieving a 20.0% mention rate, a 20.0% citation rate, and scores of 21.0 and 20.0 respectively. In contrast, five engines—Google AI Mode, Google AI Overview, Google Search, and Perplexity—return zero mentions and zero citations, representing the weakest visibility channels. Competitor pressure is intense: Claude Code leads with a 54.0 score and 80.0% mention rate, while Codex, Scale, and GitHub Copilot all outperform CodingFleet. Citation gaps are evident; although CodingFleet’s own citation rate is 10.0%, its cited domains are dominated by llm-stats.com and youtube.com, not its own site. A practical implication is that CodingFleet appears in only 3 of 5 prompts, with zero mentions in two prompts entirely, suggesting its brand is absent from key coding tool comparison conversations where competitors dominate.

Scan evidence for CodingFleet

Visibility score
5.3
Mention rate
6.0%
Citation rate
10.0%
Engines
10
Prompts
5

Strongest engines

EngineScoreMentionsCitations
Claude 21.0 20.0% 20.0%
Exa 20.0 20.0% 20.0%
Gemini 12.0 20.0% 0.0%
Bing Search 8.9 0.0% 20.0%
Tavily 8.9 0.0% 20.0%

Visibility gaps

EngineScoreMentionsCitations
Perplexity 0.0 0.0% 0.0%
Google Search 0.0 0.0% 0.0%
Google AI Overview 0.0 0.0% 0.0%
Google AI Mode 0.0 0.0% 0.0%
ChatGPT 8.8 0.0% 20.0%

Competitive landscape

  1. Claude Code claude.ai Score 54.0
  2. Codex openai.com Score 25.2
  3. Scale scale.com Score 21.9
  4. Llm Stats llm-stats.com Score 15.8
  5. Github github.io Score 14.8
  6. GitHub Copilot github.com Score 11.3
  7. Lushbinary lushbinary.com Score 10.9
  8. Simonwillison simonwillison.net Score 9.2

Most cited domains

  1. llm-stats.com 21 citations · 8.8%
  2. artificialanalysis.ai 11 citations · 4.6%
  3. lushbinary.com 10 citations · 4.2%
  4. swebench.com 10 citations · 4.2%
  5. tbench.ai 10 citations · 4.2%
  6. github.com 10 citations · 4.2%
  7. truefoundry.com 8 citations · 3.4%
  8. simonwillison.net 8 citations · 3.4%

Prompt highlights

PromptEnginesBrand mentionsBrand citations
swebench pro leaderboard real time 10 2 2
terminal bench leaderboard real time 10 1 2
gpt 5.5 vs opus 4.8 10 0 1
opus 4.8 vs fable 5 10 0 0
fable 5 review 10 0 0
Your turn

Are AI assistants
recommending you?

Your customers ask ChatGPT, Grok, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity before they buy. RankBits shows you exactly how your brand surfaces across every AI engine — run your own scan below.

Try one free scan — no signup needed.

Measure the channels buyers now ask first

AI answers do not behave like classic rankings. RankBits checks the actual prompts, engines, citations, and competitors shaping those answers.

Shift from traditional search to AI-powered discovery
📉

AI answers are a new discovery surface

Google said AI Overviews reached more than 1.5 billion monthly users in 2025, while ChatGPT was confirmed at more than 2.5 billion prompts per day.

🤖

AI citations are not the same as SEO rankings

A 2026 measurement study found nearly 30% of Google AI Overview cited domains did not appear in the co-displayed first page of organic results.

📊

Turn ad clicks into a measurable AI audit

Run a scan, see the prompts where your brand is missing, and track whether visibility improves as you publish, earn citations, and refine positioning.

18
AI engines and search sources tracked
2.5B+
ChatGPT prompts per day, confirmed by OpenAI
1.5B+
Monthly Google AI Overview users reported in 2025
~30%
AI Overview cited domains absent from first-page organic results

Sources: OpenAI-confirmed ChatGPT usage, Google AI Overview reach, 2026 AI Overview citation study.

Developer API

Run RankBits scans from your own app or workflow

Every registered user can create API tokens, start async scans, check credits, and retrieve detailed scan results over HTTP.

View API docs