AI-generated visibility summary

AI visibility summary for CodingFleet

CodingFleet currently has no measurable AI visibility. Across three tracked prompts, the brand received zero mentions and zero citations, yielding an overall score of 0.0. The only engine with any activity is ChatGPT Paid, which returned three results but with a 0.0% mention and citation rate. This complete absence stands in stark contrast to competitors. Github leads with a 100.0% mention rate and 66.7% citation rate, scoring 75.9, while Jetbrains follows at 66.7% mentions and 33.3% citations. Even lower-tier competitors like Cursor, Aider, and Continue each hold a 33.3% mention rate and a 33.3% citation rate, all far exceeding CodingFleet’s zero. Citation gaps are severe: CodingFleet appears in none of the 167 cited domains tracked, while competitors like Github.io (10 citations) and cursor.com (8 citations) are regularly referenced. A practical implication is that CodingFleet is invisible to AI-driven discovery for high-intent queries such as "best AI tool to convert Python code to Go language," where it was not mentioned despite being a relevant tool. Without any baseline presence, the brand must first establish basic mention frequency before it can compete for citations or visibility share.

Scan evidence for CodingFleet

Visibility score
0.0
Mention rate
0.0%
Citation rate
0.0%
Engines
1
Prompts
3

Strongest engines

EngineScoreMentionsCitations
ChatGPT · Paid 0.0 0.0% 0.0%

Visibility gaps

EngineScoreMentionsCitations
ChatGPT · Paid 0.0 0.0% 0.0%

Competitive landscape

  1. Github github.io Score 75.9
  2. Jetbrains jetbrains.com Score 41.8
  3. Cursor cursor.com Score 34.2
  4. Aider aider.chat Score 33.2
  5. Continue continue.dev Score 33.2
  6. Qodo qodo.ai Score 32.5
  7. Diffblue diffblue.com Score 32.5
  8. Readthedocs readthedocs.io Score 32.5

Most cited domains

  1. github.com 28 citations · 16.8%
  2. reddit.com 24 citations · 14.4%
  3. wikipedia.org 12 citations · 7.2%
  4. openai.com 12 citations · 7.2%
  5. github.io 10 citations · 6.0%
  6. arxiv.org 8 citations · 4.8%
  7. cursor.com 8 citations · 4.8%
  8. go.dev 8 citations · 4.8%

Prompt highlights

PromptEnginesBrand mentionsBrand citations
best AI tool to convert Python code to Go language 1 0 0
AI code assistant that supports multiple LLMs like OpenAI and Anthropic 1 0 0
tool to generate unit tests from existing code automatically 1 0 0
Your turn

Are AI assistants
recommending you?

Your customers ask ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity before they buy. RankBits shows you exactly how your brand surfaces across every AI engine — run your own scan below.

Try one free scan — no signup needed.

Measure the channels buyers now ask first

AI answers do not behave like classic rankings. RankBits checks the actual prompts, engines, citations, and competitors shaping those answers.

Shift from traditional search to AI-powered discovery
📉

AI answers are a new discovery surface

Google said AI Overviews reached more than 1.5 billion monthly users in 2025, while ChatGPT was confirmed at more than 2.5 billion prompts per day.

🤖

AI citations are not the same as SEO rankings

A 2026 measurement study found nearly 30% of Google AI Overview cited domains did not appear in the co-displayed first page of organic results.

📊

Turn ad clicks into a measurable AI audit

Run a scan, see the prompts where your brand is missing, and track whether visibility improves as you publish, earn citations, and refine positioning.

16
AI engines and search sources tracked
2.5B+
ChatGPT prompts per day, confirmed by OpenAI
1.5B+
Monthly Google AI Overview users reported in 2025
~30%
AI Overview cited domains absent from first-page organic results

Sources: OpenAI-confirmed ChatGPT usage, Google AI Overview reach, 2026 AI Overview citation study.

Developer API

Run RankBits scans from your own app or workflow

Every registered user can create API tokens, start async scans, check credits, and retrieve detailed scan results over HTTP.

View API docs