AI-generated visibility summary
AI visibility summary for Patrick Osinski
Patrick Osinski’s AI visibility is critically low. Across five engines and five prompts, the brand achieved only two mentions (an 8% mention rate) and zero citations, yielding an overall score of 2.4. Google AI Overview and Google Search were the strongest engines, each generating a 20% mention rate and a score of 12.0, but neither provided any citations. Bing Search, ChatGPT, and Perplexity returned zero mentions or citations, scoring 0.0. Competitor pressure is severe: Sothebysinstitute (score 19.2), Etsy (17.3), and Verisart (15.5) all dominate, with citation rates of 40%, 20%, and 16% respectively. Citation gaps are stark—Osinski has no citations, while competitors are frequently cited from domains like Instagram (26 citations), Artsy (20), and Wikipedia (19). A practical implication is that Osinski is invisible in high-volume discovery prompts like “contemporary artists combining physical and digital art” (450 volume) and “how to buy limited edition augmented reality wall art” (210 volume), where he received zero mentions. Without citations or consistent mentions, the brand cannot compete for user attention or trust in AI-generated answers.