AI-generated visibility summary
AI visibility summary for Pin
Pin holds a marginal position in AI-generated recruiting software recommendations, with an overall score of 27.1, well below category leaders HireEZ (73.7) and Gem (54.5). The brand appears in 44.4% of responses across three engines but is cited only 22.2% of the time, indicating weak source authority. Performance is uneven: Google Search mentions Pin in 66.7% of responses with a 66.7% citation rate, while Google AI Overview mentions it equally often but never cites it. ChatGPT fails to mention Pin entirely, producing a zero score. Competitor pressure is acute—HireEZ and Gem dominate across all three prompts, appearing more frequently and with higher citation counts. Pin’s citation gap is most visible in the high-volume "best AI recruiting software for startups" prompt, where it is mentioned once but never cited, while HireEZ is cited twice. A practical implication: Pin should prioritize earning citations from authoritative third-party sources, particularly for Google AI Overview, where visibility without citation currently undermines credibility and likely suppresses downstream referral traffic.
Prompt search volumes in this report are AI estimates, not measured keyword data.
