AI-generated visibility summary
AI visibility summary for Pin
Pin holds a marginal position in AI-generated recruiting software recommendations, with an overall score of 27.1, well below category leaders HireEZ (73.7) and Gem (54.5). The brand appears in 44.4% of responses across three engines but is cited only 22.2% of the time, indicating weak source authority. Performance is uneven: Google Search mentions Pin in 66.7% of responses with a 66.7% citation rate, while Google AI Overview mentions it equally often but never cites it. ChatGPT fails to mention Pin entirely, producing a zero score. Competitor pressure is acute—HireEZ and Gem dominate across all three prompts, appearing more frequently and with higher citation counts. Pin’s citation gap is most visible in the high-volume "best AI recruiting software for startups" prompt, where it is mentioned once but never cited, while HireEZ is cited twice. A practical implication: Pin should prioritize earning citations from authoritative third-party sources, particularly for Google AI Overview, where visibility without citation currently undermines credibility and likely suppresses downstream referral traffic.
