AI-generated visibility summary
AI visibility summary for Humanly
Humanly holds a moderate but inconsistent position in AI-generated hiring recommendations. Across five engines and four prompts, it achieves a 52.6% mention rate and a 26.3% citation rate, yielding an overall score of 34.5. Performance varies sharply by engine: Google Search is the strongest channel, with a 75% mention rate, 75% citation rate, and a score of 66.4, while ChatGPT is the weakest, appearing in only 25% of responses with a score of 21.8. Notably, Perplexity and Google AI Overview mention Humanly but never cite it, creating citation gaps that undermine credibility. Competitive pressure is significant: Paradox leads with a 73.7% mention rate and a score of 56.3, while Phenom Applied AI achieves a higher citation rate (47.4%) and score (48.9). Humanly's raw score (39.0) exceeds its consensus score (30.1), indicating that when cited, it is often not corroborated across engines. A practical implication is that Humanly should prioritize securing citations in Perplexity and Google AI Overview, where visibility exists but lacks source validation, to close the gap with competitors.
Prompt search volumes in this report are AI estimates, not measured keyword data.
