AI-generated visibility summary
AI visibility summary for Humanly
Humanly holds a moderate but inconsistent position in AI-generated hiring recommendations. Across five engines and four prompts, it achieves a 52.6% mention rate and a 26.3% citation rate, yielding an overall score of 34.5. Performance varies sharply by engine: Google Search is the strongest channel, with a 75% mention rate, 75% citation rate, and a score of 66.4, while ChatGPT is the weakest, appearing in only 25% of responses with a score of 21.8. Notably, Perplexity and Google AI Overview mention Humanly but never cite it, creating citation gaps that undermine credibility. Competitive pressure is significant: Paradox leads with a 73.7% mention rate and a score of 56.3, while Phenom Applied AI achieves a higher citation rate (47.4%) and score (48.9). Humanly's raw score (39.0) exceeds its consensus score (30.1), indicating that when cited, it is often not corroborated across engines. A practical implication is that Humanly should prioritize securing citations in Perplexity and Google AI Overview, where visibility exists but lacks source validation, to close the gap with competitors.
